Saturday, November 05, 2016

What Is This Painting On The Wall of John Podesta's Office?




How do we know this is actually John Podesta's office?

Because GETTY IMAGES:



And because POLITICO:


UPDATE -

Here is more on that painting...from TIME, Nov.2012
On the wall in his office at Hillary Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters, campaign chairman John Podesta has an oil painting on loan from his lobbyist brother, who is an avid art collector. The image shows two men hunched over a dining room table, bearing knives and forks. On the table lays a man in a suit, who looks vaguely like Podesta. 
“It’s better to be the guy with the fork,” Podesta quips to his colleagues, if they ask about the image, “than the guy on the table.”
THIS POST IS, ESSENTIALLY, AN ADDENDUM TO THIS OTHER POST:

YGBFKM: Podesta Emails Reveal Clinton’s Inner Circle as Sex Cult with Connections to Human Trafficking?!!?!!?!??


And with that, I want to include here some comments I saw at Ace of Spades post on the same subject.

I do not tend to remember weird shit when I hear it. If I can't relate, I don't remember. And there is, apparently, A LOT OF WEIRD SHIT OUT THERE ABOUT THE CLINTON'S AND THEIR FRIENDS:

41 Wasn't Hillary involved in a seance to speak to Eleanor Roosevelt?

59 Shouldn't really surprise anyone. The Clintons surround themselves with sexual deviants and freaks of all kinds. You think Weiner and Huma are one offs?

---

63 Recall that Podesta is also a big UFOlogist and that the FAB has publicly stated that she intends to get to the bottom of Area 51.

This, despite Bubba being preezy for 8 years -- Yeah, one too many viewings ofIndependence Day is the most probable explanation of that statement. That, and vodka.

But it does show just how closely the FAB listens to Podesta and parrots his shit.


AND HERE'S SOME MORE INTERESTING STUFF ABOUT PODESTA:

WASHINGTON POST: The long, strange history of John Podesta’s space alien obsession
Podesta started as deputy chief of staff for Clinton in 1997 and stayed with the president until the inauguration of George W. Bush. He himself was apparently somewhat obsessed with aliens. In 1998, The Post quoted Press Secretary Mike McCurry. "John can get totally maniacal and phobic on certain subjects," McCurry said. "He's been known to pick up the phone to call the Air Force and ask them what's going on in Area 51."

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for letting me know about this most repulsive practice. I had no need to know, much less suspect members of government elites are and were involved in such practices. Revolting.

Is this the kind of "personal" emails Wikileaks announced for the weekend? I don't know, I think it's too much, too late, and that it can all fire back. It's too much for people to research and absorb, even for me. We should have concentrated on the "public" shit, of which there is enough to cover with mud the entire family operation. This personal stuff sounds like something you see while waiting in like at the super market ...

Anonymous said...

There's more:

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/794671304477589504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Why did WaPo take down this #SpiritCooking article about pictures of Podesta family + naked teenagers? http://archive.is/mqIuh

Anonymous said...

Let's review some history from this election cycle. .
Study just how badly Clinton underperformed her polling numbers during the primaries against Sanders. These numbers are based on the RCP averages.

In Michigan, Clinton led the polls by 21.4 points, and she lost the state.

In Oregon, Clinton led the polls by 15 points, and she lost the state by more than 10 points.

In Arizona, Clinton led the polls by 30 points, and she only won by 17 points.

In Indiana, Clinton led the polls by 6.8 points, and she lost the state by 5 points.

In North Carolina, Clinton led the polls by 24 points, and she only won by 13.

In Wisconsin, Sanders led the polls by only 2.6 points, and on election day he won the state by 13.5 points.

In Colorado, Clinton led the polls by 28 points, and she lost the state by 18.5 points.

In New Hampshire, Sanders led the polls by only 13.3 points, and on election day he won the state by 22.4 points.

In Oklahoma, Clinton led in the polls by 2 points, and she lost the state by 10.4 points.

In Kansas, Clinton led in the polls by 10 points, and she lost the state by 35.4 points.

In New Mexico, Clinton led the polls by 14 points, and she only won by 3 points.

These are just a few examples. The pollsters lie to protect Clinton. This isn’t just a conspiracy theory…just look to the primary results to see that this is the truth.

The polls during the primaries were often wrong by double digits. If you live in a state where Trump is down 10-25 points, don’t panic…just vote. It’s possible for Trump to pull off upsets in NorthEastern and West Coast States. Don’t stay home…everybody in every single state needs to go to the polls and vote for Donald Trump for President

Many think pollsters like Gravis are angels…they are not. On the week of the Iowa caucus, they had Clinton winning by 11 points, and she only won the state by 0.2%

All of these pollsters lie to protect Clinton.

By the way, I’m glad I did this research earlier this year because as of now, I can’t even find these numbers available on the RCP website. They may have removed this info so that people forget just how inaccurate the polls were during the primaries.

On November 8th, we will make history! - posted by TrumpIllinois2016 @TheConservativeTreehouse

Anonymous said...

Sharyl Attkisson: The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of FBI Report on Hillary Clinton Email Nov. 4, 2016