Saturday, May 07, 2016

NeverTrump Faggots Gargle Their Cud

Put It Right Here, Jeb Baby!

Every Conservative out there in full flight from reality, swilling at the GOP trough, hoping they aren't serving shit sandwiches marinated in rancid bukake,

check out who your NeverTrump friends are:

AND THEN THERE'S THIS:

Jeb Bush Won’t Endorse Trump Who Is Not “Consistent Conservative” Who Supports Open Borders

HOW MUCH OF A LOW LIFE DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO STILL BE HOPING THE GOP WILL DO RIGHT BY YOU NEXT TIME, WHEN THESE ARE YOUR LEADERS?

HOW DEGRADING DO YOU WANT IT TO GET, "CONSERVATIVES?"

WEASEL ZIPPERS ASKS A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION:


Why Wasn’t There a #NeverRomney Movement?

8 comments:

Always On Watch said...

Did they sign the pledge or merely say they had signed it?

Always On Watch said...

Why Wasn’t There a #NeverRomney Movement?

Indeed!

Always On Watch said...

Recent Tweet from one of the GOP's mouthpieces:

All honor to @JebBush, who won't vote for Trump. Hasn't shown "temperament, strong character, respect for Constitution." Indisputably true.

Epaminondas said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Epaminondas said...

#NEVERGOPe

The rejection of this supposed POST-GOLDWATER conservatism as DEFINED by these political class hacks IS COMPLETE.

So sorry, isn't that clear?

Evangelical issues defined as conservative?
REJECTED as national criterion

Abortion issues defined as conservative?
REJECTED as national criterion

Gay Marriage being illegal defined as conservative?
REJECTED as national criterion

Allowing open borders as a national issue issues defined as conservative?
REJECTED as national criterion

Free Trade as an ideological necessity defined as conservative?
REJECTED as national criterion

Elections have made these things FACTS. MULTIPLE ELECTIONS. Enough elections over enough time that SCOTUS is now altered.

These items are the braying of those who need the MANTLE of conservatism to HIDE under while they have no real jobs and leech the superficial capillaries of the American society, shushing us while we object with 'conservative arms' wrapped around us, just as Pacino wrapped up Talia Shire after killing his brother in law, and her husband.
(Rand Paul excepted, he was a REAL PERSON before)

What these CRETINS (apologies, etc) who took that pledge and now suddenly have found 'conscience' larger than commitment to a principle IN FRONT OF THE FUCKING NATION LIVE ON TV need to understand is this -


Y
O
U
'
R
E

F
I
R
E
D

Pastorius said...

I don't think Abortion and Gay Marriage is as dead as you think it is.

Both of those are slippery slope situations, wherein the activists pushing for these "Freedoms" have sold the people a bill of goods and then used t to slip in abominations.

I believe I am not the only one LIVIDLY ANGRY about this.

I mean, INCREDIBLY ANGRY.

Like picking up guns and overthrowing the government kind of angry.

You've known me a long time.

Would you have expected me to say that 7-10 years ago?

How can you not be angry after seeing the Planned Parenthood videos? How can you not be angry when it is now legal for men to pull their penises out in bathrooms while your 8 year old daughter is in their presence?

Trojan Horse abominations.

Pastorius said...

I just spent some time thinking back over my positions on these issues over the years.

And, as I think about them, I realize, I have actually had consistent opinions the whole time. However, I never thought our country would go so crazy as to abuse these issues the way we have.

My position on Gay marriage has always been, I don't really care. I don't truly like the idea of a legal status for gay marriage equivalent to that of traditional marriage. But the primary reason for that is not, in any sense, that I oppose homosexual unions. It's simply because I do not favor the idea that gay adoption is equal in stature AS A SOCIAL GOOD to heterosexual adoption. IN short I believe a man and a woman are better parents to a child - all other things being equal- than are a gay couple.

On the issue of abortion, I have never thought there ought to be no right for women to choose abortion within the first few months. I have always been squishy. Generally I think abortion should be limited to the first trimester, but I don't have a lot of objection to it being pushed to four or even five months. I think abortions in the case of rape or incest are priority. I do not think any woman should be forced to carry a baby to term if that baby is the result of forced sex. However, the Left being the Left, such a loophole will be argued to death and all sex with be redefined as forced sex, and YOU KNOW IT. Additionally, I have never thought that third trimester abortions were ever, in any way, justifiable, no matter what the circumstance, unless in an extreme case, the woman will die and the baby can not, for some reason, live outside the womb. To me this is all academic, because why wouldn't eh baby be able to survive, but again, definitions matter in a strict sense, because the Left will argue (LIE) about everything to commit their Trojan Horse Abominations.

I have had it with the Left. I would welcome a revolution so they could be killed legally.

They have brought great and intense sorrow on all our lives. they have stolen joy and gratitude from our souls. they have taught our children to hate our nation, our ideals, our faiths, and themselves above all else. They are disgusting demons writhing in their own scum.

they need to be removed from the land.

I am sorry I ever expressed any willingness to compromise with such demons.

Epaminondas said...

You know my position on abortion, and it's slightly to the right of you, but on that and on gay marriage, short of a change of conscience of the population, the issue is decided electorally and social conservatives using either of these as a litmus test for nomination create LOSERS

If these people are serious the work has to be among the people, NOT at this time in selecting a presidential nominee ESPECIALLY this year