Saturday, October 10, 2009

Report: Obama's Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings Wrote the Foreward to a Pedophilia Book ...Update: Book Also Endorsed By Bill Ayers

From Gateway Pundit:

It's worse than we thought...
According to radio host and activist Sandy Rios from the Culture Campaign, Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings wrote the foreward to a pedophilia book.





UPDATE: Bill Ayers also endorsed this child sex book.

5 comments:

Epaminondas said...

It should be obvious by now that the cultural war we are in is removing the common sense middle.

In Maine an equal rights bill up for referendum which would allow REPEAL of a law which allows gays to marry, has now turned into open war over gay lifestyles being taught to first graders vs creationist book burners. MAINE. The place where towns put out american flags down all the roads, and Norman Rockwell still lives.

Or, we have multiculturalist homo faggot commies and their re-education vs fascist white separatist Jesus freaks with nooses at the ready.

I have been saying for years we are going to end up with an election choice of Noam Chomsky vs some CCC-like freak.

This is where we are going and Obama and his worshipful sick acolytes are ACCELERATING the process.

THEY decided opposition was racism and took this to the next level.

How the FUCK are we going to take this back down domestically and have some kind of intelligent debate among those WHO ARE NEITHER OF THESE EXTREMES?

Pastorius said...

Epa,
You said: I have been saying for years we are going to end up with an election choice of Noam Chomsky vs some CCC-like freak.
This is where we are going and Obama and his worshipful sick acolytes are ACCELERATING the process.
THEY decided opposition was racism and took this to the next level.


I say: So then, you're saying that, in a way, they're going to get what they conjured up out of words.

Perhaps so.

BUT,

if you think about it, this is how the Republican Party was born out of the Whig Party.

Right?

I expect that the middle will survive, and thrive, because the middle will start something called "The Tea Party" which will be a party that returns to America's Constitutional roots.

Obama's election was good for America, because it serves the purpose of driving us to rethink who we are.

In fact, all this "racist" nonsense is good too, because we're forced to reckon with it.

It's like one time when a black friend of mine told me something I had done was racist. Believe you me, he and I had a very clear conversation in the minutes that followed.

I now know who he is, and he knows who I am. Will we ever be as close as before? I don't know, and frankly at this point, I don't care.

But, I know this, I will not be called racist, considering the effort that I have put in in my lifetime AGAINST racism.

And that effort stretches way back before this blog. It has divided my family. It has cost me friends of all races, including white friends (which ought to be no surprise), and it has made me a happier person in the long run, cuz I'm rid of most of the assholes in my life.

Anyway, I suspect most Middle-ground Americans (neither extremist left or right, both of whom tend to be racist - expressing it in different ways) feel much the same as me.

maccusgermanis said...

I actually think the answer is yet to be found in extremes. Among those ''moderates'' that will sacrifice personal relationships for principles, Pastorious is in a revered minority. Most ''moderates'' are the chuckleheads most in play in the ''strong horses'' contest. Know what you know and why you know it. And accept no substitutes. In short, you reasonable folks must appear to be unreasonable enough to give the triangulaters pause.

Pastorius said...

Macus,
You know, you may be right, but I hope and pray you are not, and I do think a moderate opposition is being built against Obama, don't you?

maccusgermanis said...

The opposition is too broad to be readily defined, and so too broad to survive the defeat of its antagonist. I worry only that vigilance will again be bargained away for fairytales of a trustworthy "one." I believe Epa is correct to worry that we will see increasing extremes, but think that is because "moderates" do allow themselves to be defined as that which is the least common denominator of extremes, rather than principled people that would risk having upon themselves the slur of extremity. As long as you define yourself as between the two extremes, you are only the flag of a tug of war.