Friday, December 07, 2007

A Possible Nightmare Future: Glenn Beck Exposes Radical Islam


Part 2
Part 3
Part 4 below:

Hundreds of millions of muslims are susceptible to the fanatical message of mad mullahs, imams, and clerics. There is no shortage of youthful cannon fodder in most primitive third world muslim countries. If western civilisation is to survive largely intact for the huge challenges of the next level, it will have to be smart.

If you fail to understand what radical Islamists have in mind for you, your families, your countries, your civilisation--you will be in no position to stop it.

In fact, if you fail to understand . . . . you will probably delay any effective preventive action until it is too late. At that point, westerners will understand that what they though was war, was not really war. What they thought was curtailment of their civil rights, was not curtailment. What they thought was American Theocracy, was not theocracy at all. They will learn, but by then, sadly it will not help.

Hat tip: Augean Stables

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Glenn Beck did a fairly good job with this program, however, he is a disappointment. He refuses to take the next step and explore the foundation of all he reports on in this program.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018262.php

He clearly has no experience with the islamic trilogy (koran,hadith,sira). If he did, he would come out with such vacuuous pronouncements. Beck is in CYA mode. If you attack ISLAM itself, you risk losing your show. Does Michael Graham's name ring a bell, or Michael Savage?

which reminds me . . .


On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, SANE's David Yerushalmi explained the Mapping Shari'a Project to Michael Savage and his 10 million + strong Savage Nation

http://www.saneworks.us/David-Yerushalmi-explains-Mapping-Sharia-to-Michael-Savage-article-476-0.htm

audio:
http://www.saneworks.us/uploads/application/22.mp3

Anonymous said...

Beck's ratings are probably pretty good. But given the leftist biases of CNN, Beck is probably hanging on by his shoelaces in his relationship with top management.

So, sure, he will always cover for himself. It is up to viewers to read between the lines and take things to their obvious conclusions.

Thanks for the links.