Wednesday, November 08, 2006

RoP and the women

Sir Henry Wilson of RECONQUISTA has been doing some number-crunching in relation to probems with the muslim segment of the worlds population. Some highly interesting, number crunching with highly unexpected and deeply troubling outcomes

Earlier he produced some compelling evidence for a massive effort on the part of radical muslims to "strike fear into the heart of the infidel" through terror since the day of 9/11. Even if he accounted for the violence in Afghanistan and Iraq after the US invasions of both he found a very pronounced increase in the number of terror attacks world-wide since the big one of September 11th, 2001.

In a follow-up Sir Henry Wilson does some further analysis and finds clues there is some organizing body out there distributing resources for these attacks. He also projects the trends he's observing into the future and thos projections are as terrifying as they are clear.

And today Sir Henry Wilson sends word that he's done some number-crunching on crime-stats. Fjordman has been maintaining for some time that sex-crimes and a muslim population seem to be correlated. Now Sir Henry Wilson relates sexual crime statistics from the London metropolitan police to census data of the London metropolitan area. More specifically, he relates sex-crime statistics to the presence (in % of the population) of different religious groups.

Now, I kicked the PC habit of multi-culturalism quite a number of years ago. But still I was shocked to find the words of the Quran and the Hadeeth so starkly represented in the numbers that Sir Henry Wilson found. Take a look yourself. In fact, I urge you to take a good, long look.

Methinks the myth of Islam as respecter of women is now officially dead.

(Crossposted ate Klein Verzet)

4 comments:

Yorkshireminer said...

I know this is a little OT but Sir Henry Morgan has just published a statistical analysis of sex crimes in London Boroughs and how they correlate with the percentage of muslims living in the different boroughs, it makes very interesting reading. I suggest you take a look here is the link http://gandalf-reconquista.blogspot.com/

von Schlichtningen said...

Impressing piece of work by Sir Henry. This is very interesting and potentially very useful if the conclusions are right. However, I find that the numbers must be correlated to social class. It is known that crime is related to indicators such as poverty and lack of education - also among Christians.

If the trends hold true for comparable social classes then Muslims truly have a problem of explanation. Especially as Islam always claim higher moral values than any other religion.

Anonymous said...

And here's uncoverd meat being processed into junkfood and being sold back to the kuffars to fund the expansion of islam in Britain.

http://tottenhamlad.blogspot.com/2006/10/remembering-charlene-downes.html

Anonymous said...

Further to the previous post, here's some information on Mohammed and the morality of rape. From http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/mohwar3.html

"9) Massacre, Rape and Plunder of Banu-L-Mustaliq
Date: December 626 A.D.
Place: The well of Muraysi near Red Sea
Victims: The Tribe of Banu-L-Mustaliq

Mohammed attacked the Banu-L-Mustaliq because of their wealth. In a surprise raid, the Muslims drove them to the Sea. They slaughtered many members of the Banu-N-Mustaliq Tribe and looted away a booty of 2000 Camels, 5000 Sheep and 500 Women! 500 women were captured screaming and crying after they had watched their husbands and sons being slaughtered.

The most beautiful captive was Juwayriyya, daughter of the chief of the Banu-L-Mustaliq. Mohammed snatched her to satisfy his own animal lust. The captured women were supposed to be returned by the Muslims upon payment of a ransom. But the night after the battle itself, Mohammed and his army raped each and every one of them. One of the men Abu Sa'id Khudri of Mohammed's army reported :

"We were lusting after women and chastity had become too hard for us, but we wanted to get the ransom money for our prisoners. So we wanted to use the "Azl" (Coitus Interruptus- where the man withdraws before ejaculating)...We asked the Prophet about it and he said: "You are not under any obligation to stop yourselves from doing it like that.." Later on the women and children were given for ransom to their envoys. They all went away to their country and not One wanted to stay although they had the choice.."

So the Great Prophet of Peace told his men it was perfectly FINE to rape women as long as you didn't ejaculate inside them (which made them pregnant). What supreme logic! Any human being with the slightest shred of morality has to be nauseated by this Man and the religion he preached.

Mohammed, the supreme religious figurehead of Islam sanctions RAPE, pure and simple. Not only did the Muslims commit this horrifying crime, they decieved the Tribesmen into paying Ransom for their womenfolk, who only paid the money in a desperate attempt to save their women's honor. To call such a Prophet and his followers the epitome of Evil is probably an understatement. "