Saturday, November 11, 2006

Dutch Aim To Ban Burqas


If this goes through, they will be the first European government to do so:


The Dutch government has announced that it would seek a way of banning the wearing of burqas and other Muslim face veils in public places, possibly becoming the first European country to impose such a ruling. The announcement comes at a time when the debate on such veils and whether they prevent Muslims from integrating has gathered momentum across Europe and drawn comments from leaders such as Britain's Tony Blair and Italy's Romano Prodi.

Last December Dutch lawmakers voted in favour of a proposal by far-right politician Geert Wilders to outlaw face-coverings, partly on security grounds, and asked Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk to examine the feasibility of such a ban. Ms Verdonk said the fact veils were worn for religious reasons could bring new legislation into conflict with Dutch religious freedom laws, but signalled the government would try to find a way around this.


"The cabinet finds the wearing of a burqa undesirable ... but cannot at present enforce a total ban," she said after a cabinet meeting.

Existing legislation already limits the wearing of burqas and other total coverings in public transport or schools, Ms Verdonk said, but the cabinet would discuss imposing as wide a ban as possible next week.


"The government will search for the possibility to provide a ban," her spokeswoman told Reuters.The Muslim community estimates that only about 50 women in the Netherlands wear the head-to-toe burqa or the niqab, a face veil that conceals everything but the eyes.

The Dutch may have been among the first to legalise cannabis, prostitution and euthanasia – earning them a reputation for tolerance – but in recent years they have pushed through some of Europe's toughest entry and integration laws.


(Pastorius note: Think about what a non sequiter that sentence is. For God's sake, what does tough entry and integration laws have to do with tolerance of cannabis, prostitution and euthanasia? Are the media as stupid as they seem?)

Social and religious tensions have escalated in the last few years, exacerbated by the murder of film director Theo van Gogh by a Dutch-Moroccan militant in 2004.

Dutch Muslim groups have complained a burqa ban would only make the country's one million Muslims feel more victimised and alienated, regardless of whether they approve of burqas or not.

(Pastorius note: LOL!)

"What the government is doing now is totally disproportionate to the number of women who actually wear the burqa," said Ayhan Tonca, chairman of an umbrella group of Dutch Muslim organisations. "The legislation we already have to protect people for security reasons is adequate," he added. Hope, a Dutch-born Muslim, said she wore a niqab because she wanted to. "Nobody has the right to forbid it. If someone decides I cannot wear it then I will feel suppressed," she said.

(Pastorius note: Well, poor you, Hope. The fact is, the government does have the right to set laws to protect security and the rights of women. Gee, what do you know?)

7 comments:

Watcher said...

O, the humanity!

Pastorius said...

The Infidels won't let us marry 9 year olds anymore.

Kiddo said...

DAmned blasphemous infidels.

I like this "far-right" label smacked on Wilders though. Note that one. It's a special honor reserved for politicians in Europe who will be sanctioned or assasinated.

Pastorius said...

How far away is Sarkozy from being labeled "far right?"

Yorkshireminer said...

Its the VVD fishing for votes the election is in two weeks, we wont hear anymore of this after the election.


Dutch Muslim groups have complained a burqa ban would only make the country's one million Muslims feel more victimised and alienated, regardless of whether they approve of burqas or not.



Can they feel anymore victimised, they are always in victim mode so what difference does it make. I what I find interesting is that there is not a veiled threat after this statement (joke intended)

Pastorius said...

Heh.

Their threats are never quite as veiled as their women.

Anonymous said...

Poor Hope. She's hopeless because she's already oppressed by having to wear the bloody thing in the first place.

I storngly support Holland in this move. I wish the US would do the same thing.