Thursday, September 14, 2006

How this is a World War

One of the comparatively reasoned arguments from the Left is that the confrontation that opened on September 11, 2001 cannot be called another World War, because it lacks the definitive feature of the first two: armed states engaged in full-scale battle against each other all over the world. They say World War II, for example, was such because it involved the march of German land, sea and air forces all over Europe and North Africa, while a comparison to what is going on today would have Nazi bombs detonated in Britain’s cities from time to time, which would be a nuisance but not an existential threat, and so is Al Qaeda.

The argument is a convincing one, so he who wishes to show that the talk about “World War III” (or IV, if you count the Cold War as the third) isn’t just fearmongering on right-wing politicians’ part needs to present arguments of his own. I will do this now. My argument consists of two parts: first, that there can be war, real war, all over the world, even without full-scale clashes between state armies, and second, that there is indeed a prospect of full-scale state warfare as in the first two World Wars, and a dreadful prospect it is.

[...]

In the USA, things are better, but only in the sense that the USA is some years behind Europe in its processes of ideological death and demographic takeover. America is still strongly Christian, and that is its hope for the future. However, the inept politicians, even on the Right, are making all the wrong moves, just as in Europe, like agreeing to bring 15,000 students from Saudi Arabia to be residents of the USA. The little good that may have come from sending troops abroad to the enemy in Afghanistan and Iraq is being undone by letting the enemy into home territory.

[...]

If the Left does not regard, before it’s too late, the demographic jihad as every bit of a war as armed conflict, then we will have that which the Left does regard as the real thing. If you remember, that horrendous conflict of the years 1939–45, with millions dead, was caused by just three states run by a fascistic ideology: Germany, Italy and Japan. Three, that’s all it took. Today, just one state, Iran, is putting the future of the world in jeopardy. With regard to Iran, it is instructive to remember that it was a staunch ally of the USA until Khomeini overthrew the Shah in 1979, by virtue of Jimmy Carter’s bungling. That state, once a great ally of the United States, is now its bitterest enemy. And the frightening fact is that what happened to Iran can happen to any state with a Muslim majority—the Middle East (except for Israel; it is thus seen that the talk of Israel as being the USA’s only reliable ally in the Middle East is no idle figure of speech), North Africa, the central Asian “Stans”, Malaysia and Indonesia now, and Europe later.

In full on Our Children Are The Guarantors »

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

There is no way this is a "world war", France hasn't surrendered yet :)

Pastorius said...

No, but they sure have enjoyed a good gang rape in the Paris riots of Nov/Dec of 2005.

ziontruth said...

"France hasn't surrendered yet"? I respectfully disagree: on the contrary, France has done almost nothing so far but surrender!

It remains to be seen if Monsieur Sarkosme can reverse the trend. Color me skeptical. Or maybe Ségolène could surprise us by being plus Royaliste...

OK, enough already! I don't speak French, these were just lame attempts at showing myself to be a connoiseur. (Oops, I did it again!)

ziontruth said...

I am flattered by being complimented by a such a renowned scholar as Professor Hurgronje!

You must be very sad, however, to see how your discipline has given way to left-wing cravenness since your departure from earthly life, especially since Edward Said published his masterpiece of intellectual terrorism. My condolences.

Snouck said...

Well,

it sure sucks being dead.

Snouck